Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20091 - 20100 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 20091 - 20100 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” and that Little “has not submitted any corroborating evidence for his claim that the victim’s testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149291 - 2017-09-21
” and that Little “has not submitted any corroborating evidence for his claim that the victim’s testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149291 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Vernon H. Walker
, but that our previous decisions bar the remainder of Walker’s claims. 2 We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Walker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
, but that our previous decisions bar the remainder of Walker’s claims. 2 We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Walker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James F. Karls v. David P. Geraghty
that dismissed his legal malpractice claim against Attorney David Geraghty. The issue on appeal is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12666 - 2017-09-21
that dismissed his legal malpractice claim against Attorney David Geraghty. The issue on appeal is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209, the property for which the City claims delinquent taxes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160049 - 2017-09-21
Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209, the property for which the City claims delinquent taxes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160049 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2018AP1354 2 against him in the small claims action brought against him by Paul Ryan d/b/a Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240493 - 2019-05-14
. No. 2018AP1354 2 against him in the small claims action brought against him by Paul Ryan d/b/a Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240493 - 2019-05-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
claims in his earlier no-merit appeal. This argument relies on WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4), as interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32933 - 2014-09-15
claims in his earlier no-merit appeal. This argument relies on WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4), as interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Harris
postconviction motion. NOS. 96-1233-CR 96-1234-CR 97-1428-CR 97-1429-CR 2 Harris claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10760 - 2017-09-20
postconviction motion. NOS. 96-1233-CR 96-1234-CR 97-1428-CR 97-1429-CR 2 Harris claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10760 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Michele Kae Triebold v. Mark Edwin Triebold
to relief under WIS. STAT. § 806.07 on grounds of mistake and fraud. Specifically, Mark claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20126 - 2017-09-21
to relief under WIS. STAT. § 806.07 on grounds of mistake and fraud. Specifically, Mark claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20126 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry Woodrow Myartt
of robbery with use of force, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.32(1)(a) (1997-98). 1 He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3414 - 2017-09-19
of robbery with use of force, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.32(1)(a) (1997-98). 1 He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3414 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to lead the trial court to conclude that an evidentiary hearing is necessary.”). When the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2010-10-20
to lead the trial court to conclude that an evidentiary hearing is necessary.”). When the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2010-10-20