Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 55633 for CARROLL J SCHMIDT.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 55633 for CARROLL J SCHMIDT.
Tele-Port, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.
on the brief of John Theiler Bode of Bode, Carroll, McCoy, Hoefle & Mihal, S.C., Waukesha. On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3083 - 2005-03-31
on the brief of John Theiler Bode of Bode, Carroll, McCoy, Hoefle & Mihal, S.C., Waukesha. On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3083 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
: Dissented: Not Participating: BUTLER, JR., J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32917 - 2008-06-02
: Dissented: Not Participating: BUTLER, JR., J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32917 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
Anthony Hicks v. Willie J. Nunnery
, V. WILLIE J. NUNNERY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. † Opinion Filed: March 28, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3744 - 2017-09-19
, V. WILLIE J. NUNNERY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. † Opinion Filed: March 28, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3744 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
that the referee's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47751 - 2010-03-15
that the referee's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47751 - 2010-03-15
[PDF]
WI 14
fully complied with the requirements set forth in SCR 22.26. (j) The petitioner's proposed use
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47751 - 2014-09-15
fully complied with the requirements set forth in SCR 22.26. (j) The petitioner's proposed use
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47751 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 68
(OLR) nor Attorney Rice has appealed the recommendation filed by the referee, James J. Winiarski
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29319 - 2014-09-15
(OLR) nor Attorney Rice has appealed the recommendation filed by the referee, James J. Winiarski
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29319 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, C.J., Donald, P.J., and White, J. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537336 - 2022-06-28
, C.J., Donald, P.J., and White, J. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537336 - 2022-06-28
[PDF]
Todd Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics Machinery
JUSTICES: CONCURRED: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concurs (opinion filed). SYKES, J., concurs (opinion filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16470 - 2017-09-21
JUSTICES: CONCURRED: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concurs (opinion filed). SYKES, J., concurs (opinion filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16470 - 2017-09-21
Burnett County v. AFSCME Local 279-A
§ 111.70(1)(j), Stats.; (2) a circuit judge is subject to § 111.70; (3) the trial court acted without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10940 - 2005-03-31
§ 111.70(1)(j), Stats.; (2) a circuit judge is subject to § 111.70; (3) the trial court acted without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10940 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Burnett County v. AFSCME Local 279-A
"). The union argues that (1) a circuit judge can be a municipal employer under § 111.70(1)(j), STATS.; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20
"). The union argues that (1) a circuit judge can be a municipal employer under § 111.70(1)(j), STATS.; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20