Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 83177 for case code.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the course of conduct for which sentence was imposed” in this case. See WIS. STAT. § 973.155(1)(a) (2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187300 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] The Kraemer Company, LLC v. Pierce County Board of Adjustment
of any relevant zoning regulations. With the subsequent adoption of zoning codes in 1972, Kraemer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21221 - 2017-09-21

The Kraemer Company, LLC v. Pierce County Board of Adjustment
of any relevant zoning regulations. With the subsequent adoption of zoning codes in 1972, Kraemer’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21221 - 2006-02-06

Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Development
2001 WI App 40 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2352 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
2008 WI App 101 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP385 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33182 - 2011-06-14

[PDF] WI APP 101
2008 WI APP 101 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP385
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33182 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
Warden McCaughtry’s decision that Saenz used intoxicants, contrary to WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.59
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21

Patrick Hart v. Meadows Apartments
the total amount of $106 that was withheld contrary to Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.06(2)(a) (2003). ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7054 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patrick Hart v. Meadows Apartments
the total amount of $106 that was withheld contrary to WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 134.06(2)(a) (2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7054 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
or pursuing retraining, resulting in a total loss of earning capacity. ¶4 Significant to this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58996 - 2014-09-15