Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 3972 for davi.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 3972 for davi.
State v. John Casteel
,” City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999), and to control its docket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
,” City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999), and to control its docket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Order affirmed; order reversed. Before Anderson, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32214 - 2008-03-25
for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Order affirmed; order reversed. Before Anderson, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32214 - 2008-03-25
[PDF]
Laverne Haase v. Badger Mining Corporation
. Gordon. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Jeffrey O. Davis, Nora M. Platt, O. Thomas Armstrong
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16641 - 2017-09-21
. Gordon. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Jeffrey O. Davis, Nora M. Platt, O. Thomas Armstrong
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16641 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion in imposing the condition. State v. Davis, 2017 WI App 55, ¶12, 377 Wis. 2d 678, 901
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529550 - 2022-06-08
its discretion in imposing the condition. State v. Davis, 2017 WI App 55, ¶12, 377 Wis. 2d 678, 901
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529550 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Ernest E. Halford
conversation. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 458 (1994).3 Under Edwards, once the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2394 - 2017-09-19
conversation. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 458 (1994).3 Under Edwards, once the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2394 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Association].” The County also retained another law firm, Davis & Kuelthau, to handle certain litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143255 - 2009-07-13
Association].” The County also retained another law firm, Davis & Kuelthau, to handle certain litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143255 - 2009-07-13
[PDF]
WI 24
. The 1 The two officers are Nicole McDaniel and Matthew Davis. We refer to them collectively
/supreme/docs/22ap1759.pdf - 2025-06-24
. The 1 The two officers are Nicole McDaniel and Matthew Davis. We refer to them collectively
/supreme/docs/22ap1759.pdf - 2025-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the other sentencing factors.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶19, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074361 - 2026-02-11
of the other sentencing factors.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶19, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074361 - 2026-02-11
[PDF]
Donna Kurer v. Parke
. KURER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,† V. PARKE, DAVIS & COMPANY, AND WARNER-LAMBERT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6250 - 2017-09-19
. KURER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,† V. PARKE, DAVIS & COMPANY, AND WARNER-LAMBERT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6250 - 2017-09-19
Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
] ¶21 Joseph Davis, Hearst’s own expert, testified that the potential impact on Channel 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5003 - 2005-03-31
] ¶21 Joseph Davis, Hearst’s own expert, testified that the potential impact on Channel 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5003 - 2005-03-31