Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 30191 for de.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 30191 for de.
Sybil Drabek v. Floyd Rasmussen
that we review de novo. See Hunzinger Constr. Co. v. Granite Resources Corp., 196 Wis.2d 327, 332, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See Hunzinger Constr. Co. v. Granite Resources Corp., 196 Wis.2d 327, 332, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
obtaining the trial transcripts and regarding his decision to seek only de novo review of the Timber Sale
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35382 - 2009-01-28
obtaining the trial transcripts and regarding his decision to seek only de novo review of the Timber Sale
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35382 - 2009-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
unless clearly erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21
unless clearly erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo “the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03
review de novo “the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. Id., ¶9. “[I]f the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the movant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294348 - 2020-10-07
review de novo. Id., ¶9. “[I]f the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the movant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294348 - 2020-10-07
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
for summary judgment in the trial court. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment in the trial court. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frederick B. Rogers
. Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law, which the court of appeals reviews de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4316 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law, which the court of appeals reviews de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4316 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Steven Cushman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Steven Cushman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32180 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32180 - 2014-09-15