Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
a de novo standard of review. 2 County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603 N.W.2d 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18733 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Roger L. Kaufman v. Jon E. Litscher
to dismiss a petition because it was not timely filed is de novo. See State ex rel. Walker v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4357 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Fond du Lac v. Vincent W. English
findings of fact unless clearly erroneous and review de novo whether such facts satisfy constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18696 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James Munroe v. Kenneth Morgan
(1993) (citation omitted). We review the legal sufficiency of the complaint de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11027 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Borowski requested de novo review and the trial court conducted evidentiary hearings on February 28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon which to issue a TRO is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kristi L.M. v. Dennis E.M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920790 - 2025-02-27

[PDF] NOTICE
purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35374 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review de novo “the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03

State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
of which are subject to our de novo review. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31

Sybil Drabek v. Floyd Rasmussen
that we review de novo. See Hunzinger Constr. Co. v. Granite Resources Corp., 196 Wis.2d 327, 332, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31