Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 6143 for li.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 6143 for li.
[PDF]
State v. Brad A. Raddeman
. DUE PROCESS ¶9 Raddeman’s “same offense” argument also lies at the heart of his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2157 - 2017-09-19
. DUE PROCESS ¶9 Raddeman’s “same offense” argument also lies at the heart of his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2157 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bradford J. May
conclude that he lied when testifying. However, there is no evidence that the trial court added to May’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12390 - 2005-03-31
conclude that he lied when testifying. However, there is no evidence that the trial court added to May’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12390 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
lied in claiming that a man exposed himself to her after the man’s wife caught her loitering outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81583 - 2012-04-25
lied in claiming that a man exposed himself to her after the man’s wife caught her loitering outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81583 - 2012-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Terrance L. Richardson
and the intercourse. It is highly improbable that the jury would have drawn the inference that the victim lied when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15363 - 2017-09-21
and the intercourse. It is highly improbable that the jury would have drawn the inference that the victim lied when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15363 - 2017-09-21
State v. Harry L. Gant
the testimony and credibility of Detective Bill Searls on cross-examination. Gant contends that Searls lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2005-03-31
the testimony and credibility of Detective Bill Searls on cross-examination. Gant contends that Searls lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
discretion by imposing the sentence it imposed. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
discretion by imposing the sentence it imposed. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.046(1g), and otherwise denied the motion. This appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶7 Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44876 - 2009-12-21
. § 973.046(1g), and otherwise denied the motion. This appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶7 Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44876 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Marshall Jones
the dispatcher before he actually stopped Jones. Jones contends that the police officer lied when he gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26365 - 2017-09-21
the dispatcher before he actually stopped Jones. Jones contends that the police officer lied when he gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court found that Phillips was not a credible witness because he previously lied to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244215 - 2019-07-30
. The circuit court found that Phillips was not a credible witness because he previously lied to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244215 - 2019-07-30
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
that first hurdle, namely, proving that these sellers knew about these conditions and lied about them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
that first hurdle, namely, proving that these sellers knew about these conditions and lied about them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31