Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 6659 for mix.

[PDF] State v. Yeng Vang
to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). This claim presents a mixed question of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5993 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 An adverse possession determination presents a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90891 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robert E. Koutnik, Jr.
50 (1996). ¶12 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4114 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Steven J. Reinhardt
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. ¶14 An ineffective assistance claim presents a mixed question of law and fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2978 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
., HOMESTEAD DRYWALL, INC., HERR DIRECTIONAL DRILLING, LLC, CENTRAL READY MIXED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93086 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
not to hold an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction motion using a mixed standard of review. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Frank A. H.
(1997) (citation omitted). Whether counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5061 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, 466 U.S. at 694). ¶6 Our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim presents a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82437 - 2015-04-14

[PDF] State v. James C. Koepp
of counsel is a mixed question of fact and law, and the lower court’s underlying findings will be reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11833 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Elizabeth M. Marzouki v. Jamel Marzouki
. The determination of what is in a child’s best interest is a mixed question of law and fact. See Wiederholt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11856 - 2017-09-21