Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 17239 for probate/1000.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 17239 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
Gary Tate v. David H. Schwarz
is whether the state may constitutionally revoke a defendant's probation because he refuses, during court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16396 - 2017-09-21
is whether the state may constitutionally revoke a defendant's probation because he refuses, during court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16396 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
authority to reduce a period of probation? The circuit court denied Dennis L. Schwind’s motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208168 - 2018-02-14
authority to reduce a period of probation? The circuit court denied Dennis L. Schwind’s motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208168 - 2018-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Janice Johnson Kuhn
of her probation, following her conviction for four counts of theft by bailee for the theft of auction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16096 - 2017-09-21
of her probation, following her conviction for four counts of theft by bailee for the theft of auction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16096 - 2017-09-21
State v. Janice Johnson Kuhn
Kuhn appeals, pro se, from an order modifying a condition of her probation, following her conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16096 - 2005-03-31
Kuhn appeals, pro se, from an order modifying a condition of her probation, following her conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16096 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Todd E. Crider
of probation was not “time … spent in actual confinement serving a criminal sentence.” Because we determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
of probation was not “time … spent in actual confinement serving a criminal sentence.” Because we determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for certiorari review of a No. 2013AP1704 2 probation revocation by remanding the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143868 - 2017-09-21
for certiorari review of a No. 2013AP1704 2 probation revocation by remanding the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143868 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
” in an earlier order that resolved his petition for certiorari review of a probation revocation by remanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143868 - 2015-07-06
” in an earlier order that resolved his petition for certiorari review of a probation revocation by remanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143868 - 2015-07-06
State v. Joseph L. Kohls
; and (2) the circuit court erred by not allowing Kohls to call his probation officer as a witness. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
; and (2) the circuit court erred by not allowing Kohls to call his probation officer as a witness. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new sentencing hearing because “probation was not even considered as an alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193093 - 2017-09-21
is entitled to a new sentencing hearing because “probation was not even considered as an alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193093 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Brown sought in his postconviction motion.[2] Brown, who was placed on probation and ordered to serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
Brown sought in his postconviction motion.[2] Brown, who was placed on probation and ordered to serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29