Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 21648 for warrants.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 21648 for warrants.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of all paperwork, Car (jetta), original registration and title for car (Jetta), TV, copy of warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304809 - 2020-11-18
of all paperwork, Car (jetta), original registration and title for car (Jetta), TV, copy of warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304809 - 2020-11-18
State v. Spencer S. Henderson
protections.[3] This is because the “examination of evidence seized pursuant to the warrant requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5512 - 2005-03-31
protections.[3] This is because the “examination of evidence seized pursuant to the warrant requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a common sense test” that requires us to decide “whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06
is a common sense test” that requires us to decide “whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
was warranted. The circuit court denied Webley’s motion to suppress, concluding there was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52694 - 2014-09-15
was warranted. The circuit court denied Webley’s motion to suppress, concluding there was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” between the prosecutor and the judge—was too insufficiently developed to warrant any response from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120947 - 2014-09-15
” between the prosecutor and the judge—was too insufficiently developed to warrant any response from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
warrant and, therefore, the burden was on the State to prove that the search complied with an exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42751 - 2014-09-15
warrant and, therefore, the burden was on the State to prove that the search complied with an exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42751 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Joanie M.H.
was not warranted because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3751 - 2017-09-19
was not warranted because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3751 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that, taken together with rational inference from those facts, objectively warrant a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60309 - 2014-09-15
that, taken together with rational inference from those facts, objectively warrant a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60309 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
July 3, 2018 order, counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report to address whether a search warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218888 - 2018-09-12
July 3, 2018 order, counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report to address whether a search warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218888 - 2018-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS
and articulable facts that, taken together with rational inference from those facts, objectively warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60309 - 2011-02-22
and articulable facts that, taken together with rational inference from those facts, objectively warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60309 - 2011-02-22