Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 6410 for wide.
Search results 2011 - 2020 of 6410 for wide.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. It remains within the sentencing court's “wide discretion” to determine which factors are the most relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878389 - 2024-11-19
. It remains within the sentencing court's “wide discretion” to determine which factors are the most relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878389 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth W. Raush
is on the defendant to mitigate the weight of those factors.” The State’s argument is wide of the mark because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20
is on the defendant to mitigate the weight of those factors.” The State’s argument is wide of the mark because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Davis
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a defendant must identify specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
, a defendant must identify specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the conduct and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143144 - 2017-09-21
of the conduct and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143144 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Central Corporation v. Research Products Corporation
. In evaluating the parties’ business relationship, the court must consider “a wide variety of facets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5499 - 2017-09-19
. In evaluating the parties’ business relationship, the court must consider “a wide variety of facets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5499 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a defendant must point to specific acts or omissions by the lawyer that are “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63727 - 2014-09-15
, a defendant must point to specific acts or omissions by the lawyer that are “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63727 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Norbert W. Ellis
of the conduct and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5860 - 2017-09-19
of the conduct and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5860 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronald F. Zittlow
. This appeal followed. No. 00-2439-CR 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 A trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3002 - 2017-09-19
. This appeal followed. No. 00-2439-CR 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 A trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3002 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
or omissions. The court then decides whether the acts or omissions fall “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26683 - 2014-09-15
or omissions. The court then decides whether the acts or omissions fall “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26683 - 2014-09-15