Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20101 - 20110 of 30765 for pick ups.

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
their expectations have come up very short. ¶16 The court then went on to discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6156 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
“above her head.... Up above towards her.” T.P. testified that after the shot was fired, he and Q.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025541 - 2025-10-21

Scott Rubadeau v. David H. Schwarz
the rifles were in the basement, that they were in plain view and not locked up, and that he had access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5082 - 2005-03-31

Dianne Lynn Redenius v. Roy Carl Redenius
Dianne’s testimony that Roy had backed his truck up to the garage and removed property.[1] Having found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14659 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. When Morgan ran from an apartment police officers were searching, an officer gave chase and caught up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26

COURT OF APPEALS
. In a follow-up call the next day, Kohel’s counsel was directed to leave a message on a specific attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36725 - 2009-06-09

State v. Joseph W. Marola
there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13433 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
if anyone was forcing him to give up his constitutional right to a jury trial, and Coleman replied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2012-06-19

[PDF] State v. Shermell G. Tabor
unfairly “unsettle[d] expectations that they reasonably relied upon in setting up their defenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17874 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not attributable to excusable neglect. This conceptual thread was neatly tied up by the postjudgment court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125512 - 2017-09-21