Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 83278 for case search.
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Eric A.
] order. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury over five days. The jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22
] order. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury over five days. The jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference No. 2020AP1107 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486030 - 2022-02-23
and record, we conclude at conference No. 2020AP1107 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486030 - 2022-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Casey J. Schneck
2002 WI App 239 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4979 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 239 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4979 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
driver’s license. The trial court granted the motion and that case was adjourned. On February 2, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30324 - 2014-09-15
driver’s license. The trial court granted the motion and that case was adjourned. On February 2, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30324 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
Programs in connection with the prison sentence ordered in Kenosha County case No. 2011CF179, this finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147266 - 2015-09-01
Programs in connection with the prison sentence ordered in Kenosha County case No. 2011CF179, this finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147266 - 2015-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, prior to C.A.D. filing his notice of appeal in the instant case, the County again petitioned to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
, prior to C.A.D. filing his notice of appeal in the instant case, the County again petitioned to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
28, 2019, Gladney filed the initial complaint in this case, seeking $10,000 for property damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
28, 2019, Gladney filed the initial complaint in this case, seeking $10,000 for property damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
State v. Tina M. Satzke
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04