Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
WI App 33
and the court entered the judgment against Tung. At the sentencing hearing, Tung’s statement to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668898 - 2023-08-08
and the court entered the judgment against Tung. At the sentencing hearing, Tung’s statement to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668898 - 2023-08-08
[PDF]
State v. John R. Maloney
statements to her psychiatrist; (2) denying Maloney’s motion for a mistrial after prejudicial video footage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16233 - 2017-09-21
statements to her psychiatrist; (2) denying Maloney’s motion for a mistrial after prejudicial video footage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16233 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dorothy Goff v. Joy Seldera, M.D.
in the interest of justice on the basis of a remark included in the trial court's statement to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8900 - 2017-09-19
in the interest of justice on the basis of a remark included in the trial court's statement to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8900 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
statements from which a jury could conclude that intoxication is an issue.” The trial court in its oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44321 - 2009-12-07
statements from which a jury could conclude that intoxication is an issue.” The trial court in its oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44321 - 2009-12-07
State v. James L. Creamer
, it would exclude any statement made by a declarant who is not present at trial, thus nullifying the hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11430 - 2011-10-17
, it would exclude any statement made by a declarant who is not present at trial, thus nullifying the hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11430 - 2011-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
a few questions. The State then began its cross-examination. The third question involved a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46351 - 2010-01-27
a few questions. The State then began its cross-examination. The third question involved a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46351 - 2010-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
swore or affirmed to the notary that the statements in the affidavit were true and accurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084297 - 2026-03-03
swore or affirmed to the notary that the statements in the affidavit were true and accurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084297 - 2026-03-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Kamal was cross-examined about inconsistencies in his testimony and statements the officers claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46195 - 2014-09-15
, Kamal was cross-examined about inconsistencies in his testimony and statements the officers claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46195 - 2014-09-15
State v. John M. Kieffer
with the mushrooms. Kieffer made several incriminating statements. The officers arrested Kieffer, handcuffed him
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17077 - 2005-03-31
with the mushrooms. Kieffer made several incriminating statements. The officers arrested Kieffer, handcuffed him
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Benjamin Atkins v. Swimwest Family Fitness Center
and one-half inch card that also contained a standardized “Waiver Release Statement.” This statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16814 - 2017-09-21
and one-half inch card that also contained a standardized “Waiver Release Statement.” This statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16814 - 2017-09-21