Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 50071 for our.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the plea colloquy was thorough and not deficient in any way. We agree, and upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173397 - 2017-09-21
that the plea colloquy was thorough and not deficient in any way. We agree, and upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173397 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205687 - 2017-12-12
must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205687 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
284, 287 (Ct. App. 1996), aff’d, 209 Wis.2d 310, 562 N.W.2d 594 (1997). Our first inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21
284, 287 (Ct. App. 1996), aff’d, 209 Wis.2d 310, 562 N.W.2d 594 (1997). Our first inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162761 - 2017-09-21
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162761 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of statutory interpretation, and therefore subject to our independent review. “The purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46056 - 2010-01-19
. This is a question of statutory interpretation, and therefore subject to our independent review. “The purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46056 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶13 The interpretation of a statute is a question of law subject to our independent review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183144 - 2017-09-21
. ¶13 The interpretation of a statute is a question of law subject to our independent review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183144 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to intervention, but such matters are reserved for the court’s discretion. We will not impose our own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185736 - 2017-09-21
to intervention, but such matters are reserved for the court’s discretion. We will not impose our own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185736 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶40. ¶10 We need not proceed further with our analysis. See id., ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99252 - 2014-09-15
Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶40. ¶10 We need not proceed further with our analysis. See id., ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99252 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Relief with Addendum.” Our order informed Dyer that his motion failed to meet this court’s length
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
for Relief with Addendum.” Our order informed Dyer that his motion failed to meet this court’s length
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
). Thus, we may choose to address an issue raised for the first time on appeal in the exercise of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98184 - 2013-06-17
). Thus, we may choose to address an issue raised for the first time on appeal in the exercise of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98184 - 2013-06-17