Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 63640 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“that there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375235 - 2021-06-09

Elloy Rodriguez v. Temika King
with the record because the notice of appeal will be deemed filed the date of entry of the subsequently filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20170 - 2005-11-08

[PDF] State v. Daniel R. Parsley
in the record to suggest these adults had any contact with Kamrie when her injuries allegedly occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5608 - 2017-09-19

State v. William Speener
witnesses’ police records; (6) failing to investigate prior false allegations against the defendant; (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14305 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 29
omitted.) ¶3 Milwaukee firefighters and police officers were dispatched. Records indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136383 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and she has responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266392 - 2020-07-07

[PDF] Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
if the record shows that the trial court exercised its discretion and that there is a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6455 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Madison v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
and is supported by substantial evidence in the record, and therefore it must be affirmed. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4103 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
filed two responses. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534021 - 2022-06-21

Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
(1985). We shall not find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6456 - 2005-03-31