Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 81919 for simple case.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 81919 for simple case.
[PDF]
NOTICE
for judgment or discretion. The County directs our attention to Ottinger. The plaintiff in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15
for judgment or discretion. The County directs our attention to Ottinger. The plaintiff in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DISCUSSION ¶9 When the State claims that an erroneous suppression ruling in a criminal case was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94600 - 2014-09-15
DISCUSSION ¶9 When the State claims that an erroneous suppression ruling in a criminal case was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94600 - 2014-09-15
State v. John A. Rupp
of $8,868.96. ¶5 On June 30, 1999, in an unrelated Fond du Lac county case, Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
of $8,868.96. ¶5 On June 30, 1999, in an unrelated Fond du Lac county case, Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2021AP628 2 disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2021AP628 2 disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
Trisha M. Liethen v. Stephen W. Allen
by public policy. We agree with the circuit court’s conclusion, and affirm. ¶2 The underlying case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25343 - 2017-09-21
by public policy. We agree with the circuit court’s conclusion, and affirm. ¶2 The underlying case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25343 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Bessert
whether we should hold this case until the supreme court has issued its opinion. However, in Krajewski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3899 - 2005-03-31
whether we should hold this case until the supreme court has issued its opinion. However, in Krajewski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3899 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pamela Smith-Herzog
was inappropriate in a criminal case. The State suggested that when the guilty verdict on the PAC charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3498 - 2005-03-31
was inappropriate in a criminal case. The State suggested that when the guilty verdict on the PAC charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3498 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in that case was allegedly injured by an escaped prison inmate, and the defendants were prison guards whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
in that case was allegedly injured by an escaped prison inmate, and the defendants were prison guards whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
Dale Phillippi v. Duane Becker
. The Phillippis’ argument relies on Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 280 N.W.2d 711 (1979). In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16149 - 2005-03-31
. The Phillippis’ argument relies on Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 280 N.W.2d 711 (1979). In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed evidence (ammunition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135116 - 2017-09-21
preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed evidence (ammunition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135116 - 2017-09-21