Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 20111 - 20120 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
the trial court’s holding that it had personal jurisdiction. Kopke v. A. Hardtrodt, 2001 WI 99, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19
the trial court’s holding that it had personal jurisdiction. Kopke v. A. Hardtrodt, 2001 WI 99, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enforcement officer—specifically, Sergeant J.M.—contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.203(2) (2017-18). At trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649011 - 2023-05-02
enforcement officer—specifically, Sergeant J.M.—contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.203(2) (2017-18). At trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649011 - 2023-05-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was giving up his constitutional right to a trial. The court determined that Kirksey entered his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
was giving up his constitutional right to a trial. The court determined that Kirksey entered his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
State v. Douglas Wolff
) and an order denying postconviction relief. He makes four claims: (1) trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10701 - 2005-03-31
) and an order denying postconviction relief. He makes four claims: (1) trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven B. Skrede v. John B. Spears
.3 (R.27:134-38). The trial court denied the motion and the trial proceeded. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10636 - 2017-09-20
.3 (R.27:134-38). The trial court denied the motion and the trial proceeded. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10636 - 2017-09-20
State v. Brian K. Rundle
argues that: (1) the trial court compromised his right to confrontation and compulsory process when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13805 - 2005-03-31
argues that: (1) the trial court compromised his right to confrontation and compulsory process when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13805 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2009–10).1 Garrett argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72614 - 2014-09-15
) (2009–10).1 Garrett argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72614 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
post-commitment motion. On appeal, Birkett argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124592 - 2017-09-21
post-commitment motion. On appeal, Birkett argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124592 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bernard A. James
in the challenge incarceration program under Wis. Stat. § 302.045(2)[2] was a new factor and the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
in the challenge incarceration program under Wis. Stat. § 302.045(2)[2] was a new factor and the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31