Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 68502 for did.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 68502 for did.
Darrent Britt v. Jane Gamble
commission did not properly apply the standard set forth in § 304.06(1r) (1989-90) and instead improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4896 - 2005-03-31
commission did not properly apply the standard set forth in § 304.06(1r) (1989-90) and instead improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4896 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
there was no legal basis for the claim.[1] The Woelfels did not request a hearing on their sanctions motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112662 - 2014-05-19
there was no legal basis for the claim.[1] The Woelfels did not request a hearing on their sanctions motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112662 - 2014-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there was no basis for Brantley’s claim of taint of the entire investigation and prosecution and that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251418 - 2019-12-18
there was no basis for Brantley’s claim of taint of the entire investigation and prosecution and that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251418 - 2019-12-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: JUSTICES: Per Curiam. NOT PARTICIPATING: KAROFSKY, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370287 - 2021-05-25
: JUSTICES: Per Curiam. NOT PARTICIPATING: KAROFSKY, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370287 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
WI App 52
, and on the claimed advice of criminal counsel, Roberts did not appear. The Adamses argued that Roberts’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399785 - 2021-09-08
, and on the claimed advice of criminal counsel, Roberts did not appear. The Adamses argued that Roberts’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399785 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
petition in December 2022, M.H. did not appear. The court reviewed that the State filed affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677696 - 2023-07-11
petition in December 2022, M.H. did not appear. The court reviewed that the State filed affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677696 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Credit Union did not identify any specific exemptions. ¶7 Fetzer’s answer, filed pro se, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761161 - 2024-02-08
Credit Union did not identify any specific exemptions. ¶7 Fetzer’s answer, filed pro se, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761161 - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas A.G.
the court’s findings and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12589 - 2017-09-21
the court’s findings and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darla J. Tilley
that the warrantless search conducted after she was taken into protective custody pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.15 did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3045 - 2017-09-19
that the warrantless search conducted after she was taken into protective custody pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.15 did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3045 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Carla B. v. Timothy N.
. Because she did not get served, she argues that we should dismiss the appeal and not reach the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15327 - 2017-09-21
. Because she did not get served, she argues that we should dismiss the appeal and not reach the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15327 - 2017-09-21