Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 68502 for did.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas A.G.
the court’s findings and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12589 - 2017-09-21
the court’s findings and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 171
. § 70.11(4) No. 2009AP202 2 (2007-08)1 did not provide a tax exemption for the church-owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41828 - 2014-09-15
. § 70.11(4) No. 2009AP202 2 (2007-08)1 did not provide a tax exemption for the church-owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Thomas N. Tomczak and Mary Ann Tomczak by John Louis Castellani v. Pete L. Bailey
. The Tomczaks opposed the motion, invoking the discovery rule of Hansen. Since they did not learn of Bailey's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9768 - 2017-09-19
. The Tomczaks opposed the motion, invoking the discovery rule of Hansen. Since they did not learn of Bailey's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9768 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
there was no legal basis for the claim.[1] The Woelfels did not request a hearing on their sanctions motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112662 - 2014-05-19
there was no legal basis for the claim.[1] The Woelfels did not request a hearing on their sanctions motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112662 - 2014-05-19
Langlade County v. Janet S.
the family preservation counseling because Janet and Eugene did not cooperate. ¶7 Counselors Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4250 - 2005-03-31
the family preservation counseling because Janet and Eugene did not cooperate. ¶7 Counselors Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4250 - 2005-03-31
Langlade County v. Janet S.
the family preservation counseling because Janet and Eugene did not cooperate. ¶7 Counselors Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4251 - 2005-03-31
the family preservation counseling because Janet and Eugene did not cooperate. ¶7 Counselors Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4251 - 2005-03-31
Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
will apply the same standards that the circuit court did and independently review the Board's decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9720 - 2005-03-31
will apply the same standards that the circuit court did and independently review the Board's decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9720 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 738 (1967), and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20).1 Robinson-Trey did not file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468132 - 2022-01-04
. 738 (1967), and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20).1 Robinson-Trey did not file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468132 - 2022-01-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but the bullet did not hit any of the occupants. The State’s reasoning for charging three separate counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830224 - 2024-07-23
, but the bullet did not hit any of the occupants. The State’s reasoning for charging three separate counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830224 - 2024-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
that it is clear from A.P.’s testimony that she did not understand the distinction between inside and outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141755 - 2015-05-13
that it is clear from A.P.’s testimony that she did not understand the distinction between inside and outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141755 - 2015-05-13