Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 50100 for our.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 50100 for our.
CA Blank Order
that it did not address whether Hudy’s plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Pursuant to our order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144281 - 2015-07-07
that it did not address whether Hudy’s plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Pursuant to our order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144281 - 2015-07-07
[PDF]
WI App 104
that granting the request would “seriously impede our ability to identify and control inmates.” Pollard also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36795 - 2014-09-15
that granting the request would “seriously impede our ability to identify and control inmates.” Pollard also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163358 - 2017-09-21
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163358 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 226
not explicitly define when a pleading is “amended,” our conclusion is supported by the context of § 802.09(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30363 - 2014-09-15
not explicitly define when a pleading is “amended,” our conclusion is supported by the context of § 802.09(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30363 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth J. Piltz
be indecent. ¶12 Our discussion in Lubotsky involved the term “lewd,” not “indecent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7460 - 2005-03-31
be indecent. ¶12 Our discussion in Lubotsky involved the term “lewd,” not “indecent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7460 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d 602, ¶11. ¶7 Morgan not only provides our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26
of law that we review de novo. See Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d 602, ¶11. ¶7 Morgan not only provides our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26
State v. Idella Arrington
. We conclude that Idella's response together with our independent review of the record fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9144 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that Idella's response together with our independent review of the record fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9144 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael W. Jones
and we see none in our independent review of the record. Trial counsel put on a well-considered defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11562 - 2005-03-31
and we see none in our independent review of the record. Trial counsel put on a well-considered defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11562 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction and the order denying his postconviction motion.1 Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878389 - 2024-11-19
of conviction and the order denying his postconviction motion.1 Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878389 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
statement of the law.” Id. It is within our discretion to grant a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56874 - 2014-09-15
statement of the law.” Id. It is within our discretion to grant a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56874 - 2014-09-15