Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 82352 for simple case.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 82352 for simple case.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This appeal stems from three separate circuit court cases. According to the complaint in the first case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420023 - 2021-09-08
. This appeal stems from three separate circuit court cases. According to the complaint in the first case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420023 - 2021-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
on the doctrine of issue preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17
on the doctrine of issue preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling in a criminal case was harmless error, it bears the burden of showing beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
ruling in a criminal case was harmless error, it bears the burden of showing beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
[PDF]
State v. Floyd W. Hipsher
person in the juror’s position objectively could not judge the case in a fair and impartial manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5665 - 2017-09-19
person in the juror’s position objectively could not judge the case in a fair and impartial manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5665 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Arshel G. Ruperd v. Sharon L. Ruperd
contributed to the special circumstances.” Id. at 422. ¶4 In this case, the trial court found such special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4358 - 2017-09-19
contributed to the special circumstances.” Id. at 422. ¶4 In this case, the trial court found such special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4358 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5051 - 2005-03-31
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5051 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joeval M. Jones
2002 WI 53 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1155-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16501 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 53 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1155-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16501 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in that case was allegedly injured by an escaped prison inmate, and the defendants were prison guards whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
in that case was allegedly injured by an escaped prison inmate, and the defendants were prison guards whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed evidence (ammunition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135116 - 2017-09-21
preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed evidence (ammunition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135116 - 2017-09-21
State v. John R. Martin
from six cases which were disposed of by a single plea agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, John R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11310 - 2005-03-31
from six cases which were disposed of by a single plea agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, John R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11310 - 2005-03-31