Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 38468 for t's.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 38468 for t's.
COURT OF APPEALS
appellant’s brief that “[t]here is no evidence that the WDNR ever ordered the remediation of the Hamilton Pond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56500 - 2010-11-09
appellant’s brief that “[t]here is no evidence that the WDNR ever ordered the remediation of the Hamilton Pond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56500 - 2010-11-09
Lori Trost v. Keith D. Trost
an explicit finding that “[t]here has not been a sufficient showing that the current placement … is harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15502 - 2005-03-31
an explicit finding that “[t]here has not been a sufficient showing that the current placement … is harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15502 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert E.O.
only on the September 24 order because, he notes, "[t]he judgment roll identified that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13082 - 2005-03-31
only on the September 24 order because, he notes, "[t]he judgment roll identified that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13082 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
into the record nor clearly stated,” “[t]here was no plea c[o]lloquy conducted in this case period,” and “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31
into the record nor clearly stated,” “[t]here was no plea c[o]lloquy conducted in this case period,” and “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
pursuant to a pretrial discovery demand. Over VanStraten’s objection, the court decided that “[t]he State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to a pretrial discovery demand. Over VanStraten’s objection, the court decided that “[t]he State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian T. Vadnais
, v. BRIAN T. VADNAIS, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8892 - 2005-03-31
, v. BRIAN T. VADNAIS, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8892 - 2005-03-31
Waukesha County Department Of Health and Human Services v. Teresa B.
court's decision to deny her motion for severance. The trial court stated: [T]his is a situation where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10158 - 2005-03-31
court's decision to deny her motion for severance. The trial court stated: [T]his is a situation where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marvin D. Clements
order or injunction, that instruction alone may have constituted error,” and that “[t]hat instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3168 - 2017-09-19
order or injunction, that instruction alone may have constituted error,” and that “[t]hat instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3168 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lonny W. Sylte
, probation may properly be extended if "[t]he probationer has not made a good faith effort to discharge court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14938 - 2005-03-31
, probation may properly be extended if "[t]he probationer has not made a good faith effort to discharge court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14938 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 29, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381976 - 2021-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 29, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381976 - 2021-06-29