Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 38476 for t's.
Search results 20121 - 20130 of 38476 for t's.
Lori Trost v. Keith D. Trost
an explicit finding that “[t]here has not been a sufficient showing that the current placement … is harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15502 - 2005-03-31
an explicit finding that “[t]here has not been a sufficient showing that the current placement … is harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15502 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert E.O.
only on the September 24 order because, he notes, "[t]he judgment roll identified that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13082 - 2005-03-31
only on the September 24 order because, he notes, "[t]he judgment roll identified that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13082 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
into the record nor clearly stated,” “[t]here was no plea c[o]lloquy conducted in this case period,” and “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31
into the record nor clearly stated,” “[t]here was no plea c[o]lloquy conducted in this case period,” and “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
pursuant to a pretrial discovery demand. Over VanStraten’s objection, the court decided that “[t]he State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to a pretrial discovery demand. Over VanStraten’s objection, the court decided that “[t]he State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian T. Vadnais
, v. BRIAN T. VADNAIS, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8892 - 2005-03-31
, v. BRIAN T. VADNAIS, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8892 - 2005-03-31
Waukesha County Department Of Health and Human Services v. Teresa B.
court's decision to deny her motion for severance. The trial court stated: [T]his is a situation where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10158 - 2005-03-31
court's decision to deny her motion for severance. The trial court stated: [T]his is a situation where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10158 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lonny W. Sylte
, probation may properly be extended if "[t]he probationer has not made a good faith effort to discharge court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14938 - 2005-03-31
, probation may properly be extended if "[t]he probationer has not made a good faith effort to discharge court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14938 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 29, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381976 - 2021-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 29, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381976 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
, “[i]t remains within the discretion of the circuit court to discuss only those factors it believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37744 - 2014-09-15
, “[i]t remains within the discretion of the circuit court to discuss only those factors it believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37744 - 2014-09-15
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
. To prove prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
. To prove prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26