Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Yolanda M. Spears
their sense that substantial incarceration was warranted for reasons including what they perceived as Young’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12125 - 2005-03-31
their sense that substantial incarceration was warranted for reasons including what they perceived as Young’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12125 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is not warranted on these facts because no reasonable judge would have excluded the evidence. As I have already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79851 - 2012-03-21
is not warranted on these facts because no reasonable judge would have excluded the evidence. As I have already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79851 - 2012-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances warrant our review. ¶17 Next, Ivy contends that the circuit court should have provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33671 - 2007-12-03
circumstances warrant our review. ¶17 Next, Ivy contends that the circuit court should have provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33671 - 2007-12-03
State v. Curtis L. Levy, Jr.
there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest for an unrelated crime. 231 Wis. 2d at 461. We conclude that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17649 - 2005-04-11
there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest for an unrelated crime. 231 Wis. 2d at 461. We conclude that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17649 - 2005-04-11
State v. Roderick Lashawn Bogan
not to do directly,’ i.e., convey a message to the trial court that a defendant’s actions warrant a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20554 - 2005-12-12
not to do directly,’ i.e., convey a message to the trial court that a defendant’s actions warrant a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20554 - 2005-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous but still very deferential—is warranted due to how intertwined the trial court’s legal conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58854 - 2011-01-18
erroneous but still very deferential—is warranted due to how intertwined the trial court’s legal conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58854 - 2011-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46660 - 2013-06-05
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46660 - 2013-06-05
KML Development Corporation v. Clyde Schreiber
opinion is entitled to such persuasive effect as this court deems the opinion warrants). ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3947 - 2010-06-20
opinion is entitled to such persuasive effect as this court deems the opinion warrants). ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3947 - 2010-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing. Nothing Tillman submitted warranted a hearing in this matter. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30085 - 2007-08-27
without a hearing. Nothing Tillman submitted warranted a hearing in this matter. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30085 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
that a Machner hearing was warranted because the Record conclusively shows that Counts’s lawyer did not give him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44860 - 2009-12-21
that a Machner hearing was warranted because the Record conclusively shows that Counts’s lawyer did not give him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44860 - 2009-12-21