Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Oscar Howard
” and “interrogation” is de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d 222, 235, 401 N.W.2d 759, 765 (1987) (application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10517 - 2017-09-20
” and “interrogation” is de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d 222, 235, 401 N.W.2d 759, 765 (1987) (application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10517 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Associated Bank - Milwaukee v. Charles L. Wendt
grant of summary judgment is de novo. See M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Mgmt., Inc., 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2289 - 2017-09-19
grant of summary judgment is de novo. See M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Mgmt., Inc., 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2289 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Matthew C. Janssen
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12444 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12444 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 117
Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55013 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55013 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth R. McGrew
of cause under Wis. Stat. § 345.421 is a question of law, which we review de novo. First Nat’l Leasing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4570 - 2005-03-31
of cause under Wis. Stat. § 345.421 is a question of law, which we review de novo. First Nat’l Leasing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4570 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry T. Skibinski
. ¶6 The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statute is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2592 - 2005-03-31
. ¶6 The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statute is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2592 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Warren
of law which we review de novo. See id. at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. The trial court's treatment of a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9982 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See id. at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. The trial court's treatment of a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9982 - 2005-03-31
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
of statutory interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90305 - 2013-01-22
unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90305 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134259 - 2015-02-02
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134259 - 2015-02-02