Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] WI App 20
of a legal standard to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77157 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28209 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Rick L. Edwards
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Hensley v. Endicott, 2001 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6310 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court.” Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90106 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
any constitutional violation took place, however, is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 2
subject to this court’s de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 577, 608 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229397 - 2019-02-08

[PDF] Patrick F. Shelton v. Thomas Dolan
of statutory and case law to a given set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Bahr v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14101 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 103
. STAT. § 973.20 under a certain set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85662 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims that the physical-placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4370 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, using the same standards and methodology applied by the circuit court. See Capitol Indem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156682 - 2017-09-21