Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as unconstitutionally vague is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Bertrand, 162 Wis. 2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99893 - 2017-09-21
as unconstitutionally vague is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Bertrand, 162 Wis. 2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99893 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 27
of law we review de novo. Smith v. Goshaw, 2019 WI App 23, ¶9, 387 Wis. 2d 620, 928 N.W.2d 619
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257997 - 2020-06-15
of law we review de novo. Smith v. Goshaw, 2019 WI App 23, ¶9, 387 Wis. 2d 620, 928 N.W.2d 619
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257997 - 2020-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134259 - 2015-02-02
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134259 - 2015-02-02
Jacquie Hur v. LaVerne Holler
will therefore review the type of sanctions available under § 804.12, Stats., de novo. However, determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9883 - 2005-03-31
will therefore review the type of sanctions available under § 804.12, Stats., de novo. However, determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9883 - 2005-03-31
Margaret Barber v. Carole Barber Stoviak
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 32-33, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3937 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 32-33, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3937 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard K. Melville
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20108 - 2007-06-04
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20108 - 2007-06-04
2008 WI APP 55
. 2d at 413-14. We review an agency’s conclusions of law and interpretation of statutes de novo where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32022 - 2008-04-29
. 2d at 413-14. We review an agency’s conclusions of law and interpretation of statutes de novo where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32022 - 2008-04-29
Charles E. Keller v. Paul F. Sawyer
). The application of those facts to the applicable legal standards is a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4276 - 2005-03-31
). The application of those facts to the applicable legal standards is a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Glenn F. Plautz By Charlotte Pagel v. Time Insurance Company
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10001 - 2017-09-19
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10001 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Duane E. Elm
and whether it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
and whether it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19