Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 50070 for our.
Search results 20131 - 20140 of 50070 for our.
CA Blank Order
that it did not address whether Hudy’s plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Pursuant to our order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144281 - 2015-07-07
that it did not address whether Hudy’s plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Pursuant to our order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144281 - 2015-07-07
[PDF]
WI App 104
that granting the request would “seriously impede our ability to identify and control inmates.” Pollard also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36795 - 2014-09-15
that granting the request would “seriously impede our ability to identify and control inmates.” Pollard also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163358 - 2017-09-21
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163358 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 226
not explicitly define when a pleading is “amended,” our conclusion is supported by the context of § 802.09(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30363 - 2014-09-15
not explicitly define when a pleading is “amended,” our conclusion is supported by the context of § 802.09(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30363 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dion Patton
and will deny the motion to withdraw as counsel. Our evaluation of the trial court’s ruling involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11370 - 2017-09-19
and will deny the motion to withdraw as counsel. Our evaluation of the trial court’s ruling involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11370 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth J. Piltz
be indecent. ¶12 Our discussion in Lubotsky involved the term “lewd,” not “indecent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7460 - 2005-03-31
be indecent. ¶12 Our discussion in Lubotsky involved the term “lewd,” not “indecent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Hartung, 102 Wis. 2d 58, 66, 306 N.W.2d 16 (1981). ¶4 Our principal focus is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33618 - 2014-09-15
. Hartung, 102 Wis. 2d 58, 66, 306 N.W.2d 16 (1981). ¶4 Our principal focus is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33618 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d 602, ¶11. ¶7 Morgan not only provides our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26
of law that we review de novo. See Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d 602, ¶11. ¶7 Morgan not only provides our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26
Scott Rubadeau v. David H. Schwarz
Wis. 2d 645, 655, 517 N.W.2d 540 (Ct. App. 1994). Our scope of review is limited to the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5082 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 645, 655, 517 N.W.2d 540 (Ct. App. 1994). Our scope of review is limited to the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5082 - 2005-03-31
State v. Idella Arrington
. We conclude that Idella's response together with our independent review of the record fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9144 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that Idella's response together with our independent review of the record fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9144 - 2005-03-31