Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20141 - 20150 of 98408 for court records search online.
Search results 20141 - 20150 of 98408 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
the record for evidence to support the trial court’s findings, not for evidence to support findings the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32907 - 2008-06-02
the record for evidence to support the trial court’s findings, not for evidence to support findings the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32907 - 2008-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 15, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32427 - 2008-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 15, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32427 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Kelcey X. Nelson
. The postconviction court ordered the police department to produce “a copy of all reports and/or records regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15959 - 2017-09-21
. The postconviction court ordered the police department to produce “a copy of all reports and/or records regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15959 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kelcey X. Nelson
by the reviewing court. (Record references omitted.) Nelson specifically argues that “no determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15959 - 2005-03-31
by the reviewing court. (Record references omitted.) Nelson specifically argues that “no determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15959 - 2005-03-31
WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2551 Complete Title...
”). The parties agree that DHS informed the court on the record that DHS was “prepared to move forward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70462 - 2013-04-23
”). The parties agree that DHS informed the court on the record that DHS was “prepared to move forward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70462 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
WI APP 139
in the record, it is not the court’s responsibility to sift through the record to search for them. We caution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70462 - 2014-09-15
in the record, it is not the court’s responsibility to sift through the record to search for them. We caution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70462 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jose S. Soto, Sr.
of the lower court record establishes that [Soto] was unequivocally not at the abduction regardless whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7176 - 2017-09-20
of the lower court record establishes that [Soto] was unequivocally not at the abduction regardless whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7176 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jose S. Soto, Sr.
with the trial court that Soto was not entitled to a hearing, because the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7176 - 2005-03-31
with the trial court that Soto was not entitled to a hearing, because the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7176 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig A. Sussek
to consider each of them against the backdrop of the other. In addition, the record reveals that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13265 - 2005-03-31
to consider each of them against the backdrop of the other. In addition, the record reveals that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13265 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sussek
the backdrop of the other. In addition, the record reveals that the court did not ignore Sussek’s personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13265 - 2017-09-21
the backdrop of the other. In addition, the record reveals that the court did not ignore Sussek’s personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13265 - 2017-09-21