Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20141 - 20150 of 59303 for quit claim deed.
Search results 20141 - 20150 of 59303 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, the circuit court denied relief on the ground that Jones’s claim was barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34069 - 2008-09-22
of conviction, the circuit court denied relief on the ground that Jones’s claim was barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34069 - 2008-09-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” in the PSI report and the trial court’s disbelief of Fowler’s claimed illiteracy. No. 2016AP2273
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=200272 - 2017-10-31
” in the PSI report and the trial court’s disbelief of Fowler’s claimed illiteracy. No. 2016AP2273
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=200272 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
State v. Lee A. Brown
to § 940.225(2)(a), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Brown claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10525 - 2017-09-20
to § 940.225(2)(a), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Brown claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10525 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
claims in his earlier no-merit appeal. This argument relies on WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4), as interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32933 - 2014-09-15
claims in his earlier no-merit appeal. This argument relies on WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4), as interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2008AP1481 2 (2007-08).1 Because Warren’s claims are either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36883 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2008AP1481 2 (2007-08).1 Because Warren’s claims are either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel that there is no arguable merit to a claim that Medina’s plea was invalid. See State v. Bangert
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599336 - 2022-12-13
counsel that there is no arguable merit to a claim that Medina’s plea was invalid. See State v. Bangert
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599336 - 2022-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
to collect the money because Michael Leafblad was bankrupt. Terrance Leafblad added a third-party claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96308 - 2005-03-31
to collect the money because Michael Leafblad was bankrupt. Terrance Leafblad added a third-party claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96308 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and incomplete. We conclude that Allen’s claim that denial of her motion in limine was error is too inadequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95729 - 2013-04-24
and incomplete. We conclude that Allen’s claim that denial of her motion in limine was error is too inadequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95729 - 2013-04-24
[PDF]
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of Milwaukee
, relative to the negligence claim, that the City "did not properly monitor the volume of water through
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16687 - 2017-09-21
, relative to the negligence claim, that the City "did not properly monitor the volume of water through
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16687 - 2017-09-21
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of Milwaukee
alleged both negligence and nuisance. The complaint averred, relative to the negligence claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16687 - 2005-03-31
alleged both negligence and nuisance. The complaint averred, relative to the negligence claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16687 - 2005-03-31