Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 25684 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 25684 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Daniel J. Phillips
an officer possesses specific and articulable facts which would warrant a reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4727 - 2005-03-31
an officer possesses specific and articulable facts which would warrant a reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4727 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140979 - 2015-04-29
, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140979 - 2015-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
) theft; (4) battery; (5) conspiracy to cause injury; and (6) malicious and outrageous conduct warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114770 - 2014-06-16
) theft; (4) battery; (5) conspiracy to cause injury; and (6) malicious and outrageous conduct warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114770 - 2014-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the warrant requirement[.]’” Brar, 376 Wis. 2d 685, ¶16 (citation omitted). ¶10 After hearing testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815559 - 2024-06-19
to the warrant requirement[.]’” Brar, 376 Wis. 2d 685, ¶16 (citation omitted). ¶10 After hearing testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815559 - 2024-06-19
State v. Paul F. Wischer
was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.” State v. Ross, 2003 WI App 27, ¶47, 260 Wis. 2d 291, 659 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6657 - 2005-03-31
was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.” State v. Ross, 2003 WI App 27, ¶47, 260 Wis. 2d 291, 659 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6657 - 2005-03-31
Laurie Briggs v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
litigated in court that public policy warrants an award of costs. However, her argument is ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15448 - 2005-03-31
litigated in court that public policy warrants an award of costs. However, her argument is ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15448 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Sybers
)(a) or other mandatory duties. ¶10 A manifest injustice warranting a plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5668 - 2005-03-31
)(a) or other mandatory duties. ¶10 A manifest injustice warranting a plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5668 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
warrants a rehearing “rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.” See Schroud v. Milwaukee Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134598 - 2017-09-21
warrants a rehearing “rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.” See Schroud v. Milwaukee Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard D. Martin
This court concludes that the suspicious activity Wege observed warranted the minimal intrusion of Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3231 - 2017-09-19
This court concludes that the suspicious activity Wege observed warranted the minimal intrusion of Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3231 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
warranting sentence modification. Spencer then moved for additional sentence credit in June 2018, citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757062 - 2024-01-30
warranting sentence modification. Spencer then moved for additional sentence credit in June 2018, citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757062 - 2024-01-30