Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
WI App 56
is a question of law we review de novo. Waite v. Easton-White Creek Lions, Inc., 2006 WI App 19, ¶5, 289 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246898 - 2020-01-07
is a question of law we review de novo. Waite v. Easton-White Creek Lions, Inc., 2006 WI App 19, ¶5, 289 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246898 - 2020-01-07
Thomas G. Schanke v. Mitchell Street State Bank
review questions of law de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s analysis. Lomax v. Fiedler, 204 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4073 - 2005-03-31
review questions of law de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s analysis. Lomax v. Fiedler, 204 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4073 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶13 Werdin first asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64079 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶13 Werdin first asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64079 - 2014-09-15
Anton H. Turrittin v. Town of La Pointe
the dismissal of their claim. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13114 - 2005-03-31
the dismissal of their claim. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Carrington, 134 Wis. 2d 260, 262, 397 N.W.2d 484 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030935 - 2025-11-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Carrington, 134 Wis. 2d 260, 262, 397 N.W.2d 484 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030935 - 2025-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
rights to a trial de novo in the circuit court. Boushele timely demanded a trial before the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82286 - 2012-05-09
rights to a trial de novo in the circuit court. Boushele timely demanded a trial before the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82286 - 2012-05-09
[PDF]
Ira Lee Anderson-El v. Marianne Cooke
. 1993). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13736 - 2014-09-15
. 1993). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13736 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309- 10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20108 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309- 10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20108 - 2014-09-15
Raymond J. Topps v. County of Walworth
of Wis. Stat. § 75.521. Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo review. State v. Hughes, 218
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5024 - 2005-03-31
of Wis. Stat. § 75.521. Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo review. State v. Hughes, 218
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. Johnson v. Berge, 2003 WI App 51, ¶4, 260 Wis. 2d 758, 659 N.W.2d 418. ¶8 When we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42805 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Johnson v. Berge, 2003 WI App 51, ¶4, 260 Wis. 2d 758, 659 N.W.2d 418. ¶8 When we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42805 - 2014-09-15