Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 29810 for des.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as unconstitutionally vague is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Bertrand, 162 Wis. 2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99893 - 2017-09-21
as unconstitutionally vague is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Bertrand, 162 Wis. 2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99893 - 2017-09-21
John G. Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District
review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Public employees are immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12553 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Public employees are immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12553 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carlton B. Campbell
. The application of § 973.12(1) to the undisputed facts of this case presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9503 - 2005-03-31
. The application of § 973.12(1) to the undisputed facts of this case presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9503 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shauna L. Conroy v. Marquette University
review de novo. Schlomer v. Perina, 169 Wis.2d 247, 252, 485 N.W.2d 399, 401-02 (1992). Public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11265 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. Schlomer v. Perina, 169 Wis.2d 247, 252, 485 N.W.2d 399, 401-02 (1992). Public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11265 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
legal conclusions de novo. See State v. Lonkoski, 2013 WI 30, ¶21, 346 Wis. 2d 523, 828 N.W.2d 552
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196777 - 2017-09-26
legal conclusions de novo. See State v. Lonkoski, 2013 WI 30, ¶21, 346 Wis. 2d 523, 828 N.W.2d 552
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196777 - 2017-09-26
[PDF]
Marquette University v. Debbie A. Lapertosa
to the breach of contract suit. ¶15 Our review of a trial court’s decision on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15513 - 2017-09-21
to the breach of contract suit. ¶15 Our review of a trial court’s decision on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15513 - 2017-09-21
State v. Will E. Edwards
muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was deficient and whether any deficiencies caused prejudice are legal questions that this court reviews de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940799 - 2025-04-15
was deficient and whether any deficiencies caused prejudice are legal questions that this court reviews de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940799 - 2025-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W.2d 920 (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076289 - 2026-02-11
to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W.2d 920 (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076289 - 2026-02-11
State v. Richard K. Melville
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20108 - 2007-06-04
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20108 - 2007-06-04