Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 29756 for des.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 29756 for des.
Waukesha County v. Dodge County
, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14669 - 2005-03-31
, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law de novo. Id. However, when we review an agency’s interpretation or application of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76790 - 2014-09-15
of law de novo. Id. However, when we review an agency’s interpretation or application of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76790 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Douglass Potter
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.046. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6662 - 2017-09-20
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.046. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6662 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Modern Materials, Inc. v. Advanced Tooling Specialists, Inc.
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Armstrong v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10136 - 2017-09-19
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Armstrong v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10136 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was deficient and whether any deficiencies caused prejudice are legal questions that this court reviews de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940799 - 2025-04-15
was deficient and whether any deficiencies caused prejudice are legal questions that this court reviews de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940799 - 2025-04-15
[PDF]
WI 42
of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65891 - 2014-09-15
of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65891 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kerby G. Denman
review de novo. See State v. Bernstein, 231 Wis. 2d 392, 399, 605 N.W.2d 555 (Ct. App. 1999), review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15747 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Bernstein, 231 Wis. 2d 392, 399, 605 N.W.2d 555 (Ct. App. 1999), review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15747 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pamela A. Schmidt
which we review de novo. State v Sample, 215 Wis.2d 486, 494, 573 N.W.2d 187, 190 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13193 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. State v Sample, 215 Wis.2d 486, 494, 573 N.W.2d 187, 190 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13193 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). “We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). “We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Id. No. 2007AP1170-CR 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35015 - 2014-09-15
is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Id. No. 2007AP1170-CR 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35015 - 2014-09-15