Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 63933 for records/1000.
Search results 20151 - 20160 of 63933 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
exchange: [Defense Counsel]: … On the next page, on page three, there’s an entry in the prior record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110343 - 2014-04-14
exchange: [Defense Counsel]: … On the next page, on page three, there’s an entry in the prior record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110343 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Jerry A. Maze
on the record by the court. We conclude that Maze relied on inaccurate information which was provided by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13442 - 2017-09-21
on the record by the court. We conclude that Maze relied on inaccurate information which was provided by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486559 - 2022-02-23
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486559 - 2022-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
that: (1) such records actually exist; (2) such records would have contained evidence relevant to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4890 - 2017-09-19
that: (1) such records actually exist; (2) such records would have contained evidence relevant to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4890 - 2017-09-19
Carole F. Edland v. Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation
on its own. We conclude that when the record demonstrates the circuit court's intention to send notice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17130 - 2005-03-31
on its own. We conclude that when the record demonstrates the circuit court's intention to send notice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17130 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry A. Maze
was not a condition of the plea, made at the plea hearing and accepted on the record by the court. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13442 - 2005-03-31
was not a condition of the plea, made at the plea hearing and accepted on the record by the court. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13442 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The Estate of Harvey L. Tucker v. Forest County Potawatomi Community
of the exceptions enumerated in that section. Id. ¶8 The record supports the court’s implicit determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5677 - 2017-09-19
of the exceptions enumerated in that section. Id. ¶8 The record supports the court’s implicit determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5677 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no testimony in the record that the smell of marijuana was the same today as at the time of the incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146392 - 2015-08-17
that there was no testimony in the record that the smell of marijuana was the same today as at the time of the incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146392 - 2015-08-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
considering counsel’s no-merit report and after conducting an independent review of the record, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94189 - 2014-09-15
considering counsel’s no-merit report and after conducting an independent review of the record, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94189 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Tucker mischaracterizes the testimony in question. There is absolutely no support in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218229 - 2018-08-28
Tucker mischaracterizes the testimony in question. There is absolutely no support in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218229 - 2018-08-28