Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20161 - 20170 of 40262 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 20161 - 20170 of 40262 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Jamal R. Jackson
that “is uniformly rejected by me.” Relying on this “uniformly rejected” statement, Jackson argues to this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12771 - 2005-03-31
that “is uniformly rejected by me.” Relying on this “uniformly rejected” statement, Jackson argues to this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12771 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
participation in the robberies from statements they heard while conducting an unlawful intrusion into Hansen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30533 - 2007-10-09
participation in the robberies from statements they heard while conducting an unlawful intrusion into Hansen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30533 - 2007-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence and post-arrest statements.” The trial court summarily denied the motion. We affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30086 - 2014-09-15
evidence and post-arrest statements.” The trial court summarily denied the motion. We affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.19 in many ways. For instance, the brief does not contain “[a] statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199830 - 2017-10-27
. STAT. RULE 809.19 in many ways. For instance, the brief does not contain “[a] statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199830 - 2017-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Clemons
car and statements he later made to police, claiming that the police exceeded the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5571 - 2017-09-19
car and statements he later made to police, claiming that the police exceeded the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5571 - 2017-09-19
State v. Chris R. Howard
also contends that the prosecutor made unsupported statements at sentencing which should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3788 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the prosecutor made unsupported statements at sentencing which should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3788 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry A. Tollefson
probation agent. He then goes on to dispute the revocation summary and the agent’s statement at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2005-03-31
probation agent. He then goes on to dispute the revocation summary and the agent’s statement at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Regies Mundy
statement. The court then sentenced Mundy to twelve years on count 1, six years on count 2, consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7882 - 2017-09-19
statement. The court then sentenced Mundy to twelve years on count 1, six years on count 2, consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7882 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
stated it “has reviewed documents and heard statements by Mr. West.” The court also indicated it had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113461 - 2014-06-02
stated it “has reviewed documents and heard statements by Mr. West.” The court also indicated it had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113461 - 2014-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Dan E. Holman
. The statements at issue here certainly could be construed as “intimidation,” and therefore were reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4341 - 2017-09-19
. The statements at issue here certainly could be construed as “intimidation,” and therefore were reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4341 - 2017-09-19