Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20171 - 20180 of 65130 for or b.
Search results 20171 - 20180 of 65130 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87863 - 2012-10-09
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87863 - 2012-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 10, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
Wis. Admin. Code Tax § 18.05(1)(a), (b). Tax § 18.05(1)(d) provides that lands enrolled in a federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27663 - 2007-01-09
Wis. Admin. Code Tax § 18.05(1)(a), (b). Tax § 18.05(1)(d) provides that lands enrolled in a federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27663 - 2007-01-09
Jill Winnega v. North Central Health Protection Plan
are defined as: (A) Required for the diagnosis or treatment of the Illness or symptoms; (B) Provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13648 - 2005-03-31
are defined as: (A) Required for the diagnosis or treatment of the Illness or symptoms; (B) Provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13648 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, forgoing double damages under Wis. Stat. § 100.18(11)(b)2. as well as tort damages, including punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24
, forgoing double damages under Wis. Stat. § 100.18(11)(b)2. as well as tort damages, including punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24
State v. Devontes D. Harris
by the instructions. This court also finds no evidence the jury was misled by the instructions. B. Prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18848 - 2005-07-05
by the instructions. This court also finds no evidence the jury was misled by the instructions. B. Prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18848 - 2005-07-05
State v. Gregory A. Gibbs
)(b)4, Stats. [1] Redesignated § 961.41(3g)(e), Stats., by 1995 Wis. Act 448, § 262, effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11153 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] Redesignated § 961.41(3g)(e), Stats., by 1995 Wis. Act 448, § 262, effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11153 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30368 - 2007-09-24
: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30368 - 2007-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. but also “B.[A]., who was forced to watch her friend assaulted.” In considering character, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59984 - 2011-02-14
. but also “B.[A]., who was forced to watch her friend assaulted.” In considering character, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59984 - 2011-02-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. Code § ATCP 134.06(2)(b) (2006). ¶8 Thus, we must examine the lease to determine the last day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
. Code § ATCP 134.06(2)(b) (2006). ¶8 Thus, we must examine the lease to determine the last day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
as to how the sliver of glass, as opposed to the blood evidence, would have been relevant. B. Due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
as to how the sliver of glass, as opposed to the blood evidence, would have been relevant. B. Due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09