Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20181 - 20190 of 84253 for case number.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the number of law enforcement officers present2 and “simply [observing] a change in [Jacobs’] demeanor from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
an arbitrary decision. This was not the case here. In fact, many of the factors from the Wollman test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30618 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to refer to all involved parties in this case. 3 Zachary’s father is deceased. The parental rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994702 - 2025-08-12

COURT OF APPEALS
footnote number three lists twelve cases with language disapproved by the opinion and that Olguin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85278 - 2012-07-23

State v. Jerald J. Hupe
receiving the complaint. He cites Richardson for support. In that case, police received an anonymous tip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10348 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Albert J. Armonda
2004 WI 82 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 04-0984-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16828 - 2005-03-31

State v. Calvin Morrison
may be implied at law based upon a defendant's conduct. These cases, however, represent situations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10996 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
was sentenced by another judge shortly before the sentencing in these cases. Because a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 2 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given preference and shall be taken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132530 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
denied Jacobs’ motion after a hearing. The court determined that with the number of law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30