Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20181 - 20190 of 58285 for speedy trial.

[PDF] County of Dane v. Donald G. Blatterman
blood alcohol test rendered the Intoxilyzer test inadmissible; and (3) whether the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9360 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21. We affirm. After a trial in 2017, Cleaves was convicted of three counts of second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646235 - 2023-04-20

[PDF] State v. Felipe R. Domenech
the trial court erred by admitting transcribed portions of a telephone No. 2004AP2357-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18810 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lamont Thao v. Paul Christianson
and a demand for a trial. After a trial to the court, the circuit court concluded neither party met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6976 - 2017-09-20

Valley Land Company v. John Salmon
. After trial to the court, the court found that the parties’ conduct did not make time of the essence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3932 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Floyd E. Murphy
a victim by attempting to dissuade her from reporting a crime, contrary to § 940.44(1), STATS. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11959 - 2017-09-21

Lee J. Petrina v. James Barnard
wrongful eviction and invasion of their rights to private occupancy. They argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9701 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, and then quickly fled. At trial, the State presented several witnesses who claimed to have been among
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37751 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at the trial if he continues to be disruptive,” that, if he abided by the rules of the court, he could remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106464 - 2017-09-21

State v. John W. Rodgers
months in prison. He argues that the police lacked probable cause for his arrest, that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9363 - 2005-03-31