Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20191 - 20200 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20191 - 20200 of 30242 for de.
Kathrine I. Barber v. Anne Schmitz Arnesen
We review motions challenging evidence sufficiency de novo. Seraphine v. Hardiman, 44 Wis. 2d 60, 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5978 - 2005-03-31
We review motions challenging evidence sufficiency de novo. Seraphine v. Hardiman, 44 Wis. 2d 60, 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5978 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the evidence is sufficient to support a jury’s guilty verdict is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013950 - 2025-09-24
. Whether the evidence is sufficient to support a jury’s guilty verdict is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013950 - 2025-09-24
[PDF]
State v. Edward Parker
and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1, 3 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11074 - 2017-09-19
and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1, 3 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11074 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick J.
in a reasonable way. Brandon S. S., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7475 - 2005-03-31
in a reasonable way. Brandon S. S., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peter A. Moss
interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case, the court's authority to order the forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3160 - 2017-09-19
interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case, the court's authority to order the forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3160 - 2017-09-19
State v. Isace A. Whiting
at issue, the supreme court concluded that its review was de novo, id., ¶11, and its ultimate conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5415 - 2005-03-31
at issue, the supreme court concluded that its review was de novo, id., ¶11, and its ultimate conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Woodrow K. Bartlett
de novo. Id. at 137-38. ¶17 A law enforcement officer may lawfully conduct an investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3951 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. at 137-38. ¶17 A law enforcement officer may lawfully conduct an investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3951 - 2005-03-31
Michael W. Bruzas v. Cipriano Quezada-Garcia
to the committee’s decisions but would review them de novo.” Id. In so holding, the court rejected the employer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2114 - 2005-03-31
to the committee’s decisions but would review them de novo.” Id. In so holding, the court rejected the employer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2114 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Hirn
is inadmissible under a hearsay objection, however, is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Stevens, 171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13342 - 2005-03-31
is inadmissible under a hearsay objection, however, is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Stevens, 171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13342 - 2005-03-31