Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20191 - 20200 of 29810 for des.
Search results 20191 - 20200 of 29810 for des.
State v. Richard K. Melville
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20108 - 2007-06-04
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20108 - 2007-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See LaCount v. General Cas. Co., 2006 WI 14, ¶20, 288 Wis. 2d 358
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66433 - 2011-06-22
is a question of law that we review de novo. See LaCount v. General Cas. Co., 2006 WI 14, ¶20, 288 Wis. 2d 358
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66433 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
is a “constitutional issue” presenting “a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18978 - 2017-09-21
is a “constitutional issue” presenting “a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robin C. Acker v. Lawrence P. Sullivan, M.D.
is de novo. See Wisconsin Natural Gas Co. v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Constr. Co., 96 Wis.2d 314, 336-340
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8465 - 2017-09-19
is de novo. See Wisconsin Natural Gas Co. v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Constr. Co., 96 Wis.2d 314, 336-340
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8465 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles G. Montgomery
), and whether counsel’s deficient performance was prejudicial is a question of law to be reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21122 - 2006-01-30
), and whether counsel’s deficient performance was prejudicial is a question of law to be reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21122 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and application of No. 2024AP1908 5 statutes de novo. State v. Pal, 2017 WI 44, ¶12, 374 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1056714 - 2025-12-30
and application of No. 2024AP1908 5 statutes de novo. State v. Pal, 2017 WI 44, ¶12, 374 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1056714 - 2025-12-30
2006 WI APP 252
will affirm the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26702 - 2006-12-19
will affirm the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26702 - 2006-12-19
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 45
nearly” one of first impression will receive “due weight” deference. Id. Finally, a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94555 - 2017-09-21
nearly” one of first impression will receive “due weight” deference. Id. Finally, a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a taking of private property without just compensation is a question of law” that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204936 - 2017-12-14
a taking of private property without just compensation is a question of law” that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204936 - 2017-12-14