Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20191 - 20200 of 74106 for public records.
Search results 20191 - 20200 of 74106 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. was sent a copy of the report, and has not filed a response. 2 Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192365 - 2017-09-21
. was sent a copy of the report, and has not filed a response. 2 Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682144 - 2023-07-26
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682144 - 2023-07-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Springdale. Garfoot sought to have declared void a recorded affidavit in which Springdale stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29934 - 2014-09-15
of Springdale. Garfoot sought to have declared void a recorded affidavit in which Springdale stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29934 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
possession under WIS. STAT. § 893.25 (2007-08)1 or by ten years of adverse possession with record title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
possession under WIS. STAT. § 893.25 (2007-08)1 or by ten years of adverse possession with record title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
void a recorded affidavit in which Springdale stated that it did not recognize the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29934 - 2007-08-08
void a recorded affidavit in which Springdale stated that it did not recognize the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29934 - 2007-08-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the motion are conclusory; or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192635 - 2017-09-21
in the motion are conclusory; or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466923 - 2021-12-29
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466923 - 2021-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Criminal Appeals Unit Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248821 - 2019-10-15
State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Criminal Appeals Unit Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248821 - 2019-10-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252653 - 2020-01-22
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252653 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the evidence in the record. No. 2006AP3034 4 ¶7 To determine whether the court was proscribed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30818 - 2014-09-15
on the evidence in the record. No. 2006AP3034 4 ¶7 To determine whether the court was proscribed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30818 - 2014-09-15