Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 6309 for 208.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 6309 for 208.
[PDF]
Tracy Lynn McCabe v. Gerald Robert McCabe
the sound discretion of the circuit court. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 171, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14970 - 2017-09-21
the sound discretion of the circuit court. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 171, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14970 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997). A defendant seeking a new trial on this basis must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55817 - 2010-10-26
. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997). A defendant seeking a new trial on this basis must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55817 - 2010-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Terry Patterson
§ 946.41, STATS. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14701 - 2017-09-21
§ 946.41, STATS. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14701 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 190, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). Dunagan’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52945 - 2010-08-02
. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 190, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). Dunagan’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52945 - 2010-08-02
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
A defendant has a due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. See State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4661 - 2005-03-31
A defendant has a due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. See State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4661 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
A defendant has a due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. See State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
A defendant has a due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. See State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
A defendant has a due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. See State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4656 - 2005-03-31
A defendant has a due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. See State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4656 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
A defendant has a due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. See State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4659 - 2005-03-31
A defendant has a due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. See State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4659 - 2005-03-31
City of Fountain City v. Lance Wilson
to overrule, modify or withdraw language from a previous supreme court case.” Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16151 - 2005-03-31
to overrule, modify or withdraw language from a previous supreme court case.” Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16151 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. April O.
statutory language, and precedent compels reversal. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189, 560 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3420 - 2017-09-19
statutory language, and precedent compels reversal. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189, 560 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3420 - 2017-09-19