Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
questioned, apprehended, taken into custody or detention, held for investigation, arrested, charged
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880567 - 2024-11-20

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
into custody or detention, held for investigation, arrested, charged with, indicted or tried pursuant to law
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884878 - 2024-12-02

COURT OF APPEALS
denying his post-conviction motion for resentencing. He contends the circuit court relied on an improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112578 - 2014-05-19

[PDF] State v. Anthony J. Dentici, Jr.
of his constructive custody. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Dentici’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4110 - 2017-09-20

State v. Anthony J. Dentici, Jr.
of an order of the trial court denying his postconviction motion requesting sentence credit for the period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4110 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patricia Radigan Brophy v. Michael E. Radigan
account in her and Brophy's names as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10385 - 2017-09-20

Patricia Radigan Brophy v. Michael E. Radigan
an investment account in her and Brophy's names as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10385 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Virginia Rose Ray
of a father in 1998 to re-establish joint custody of his two children after his former spouse moved them
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16522 - 2011-07-12

[PDF] WI 116
of a father in 1998 to re-establish joint custody of his two children after his former spouse moved them
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16522 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Ann Marie Jahimiak v. David Ralph Jahimiak
of divorce, and from an order denying their No. 99-0922 2 motions for reconsideration. David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15349 - 2017-09-21