Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44484 - 2009-12-09
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44484 - 2009-12-09
[PDF]
Gordon A. Gerke v. Jason R. Coyier
to interpret its plan; therefore, we review the terms of the plan de novo. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11674 - 2017-09-19
to interpret its plan; therefore, we review the terms of the plan de novo. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11674 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and application of a statute de novo. See Gasper v. Parbs, 2001 WI App 259, ¶8, 249 Wis. 2d 106, 637 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212620 - 2018-07-12
and application of a statute de novo. See Gasper v. Parbs, 2001 WI App 259, ¶8, 249 Wis. 2d 106, 637 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212620 - 2018-07-12
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
River Alliance of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert de chambeau, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert de chambeau, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31
Frank T. White v. Richard Raemisch
). The de minimus use of force is excluded from constitutional recognition, however, when the type of force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15778 - 2005-03-31
). The de minimus use of force is excluded from constitutional recognition, however, when the type of force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15778 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
unless clearly erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21
unless clearly erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30004 - 2014-09-15
evidence. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30004 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12
de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12