Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 30059 for de.
Frank T. White v. Richard Raemisch
). The de minimus use of force is excluded from constitutional recognition, however, when the type of force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15778 - 2005-03-31
). The de minimus use of force is excluded from constitutional recognition, however, when the type of force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15778 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
unless clearly erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21
unless clearly erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30004 - 2014-09-15
evidence. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30004 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12
de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32231 - 2008-03-24
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32231 - 2008-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by Escalona presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454132 - 2021-11-23
by Escalona presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454132 - 2021-11-23
Roger L. Kaufman v. Jon E. Litscher
it was not timely filed is de novo. See State ex rel. Walker v. McCaughtry, 2001 WI App 110, ¶11, 244 Wis. 2d 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4357 - 2005-03-31
it was not timely filed is de novo. See State ex rel. Walker v. McCaughtry, 2001 WI App 110, ¶11, 244 Wis. 2d 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4357 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason R. Brown
a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15155 - 2017-09-21
a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15155 - 2017-09-21
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02