Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 30191 for de.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Bradley G. Genrich
of the intoxication instruction is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24519 - 2017-09-21
of the intoxication instruction is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24519 - 2017-09-21
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
[PDF]
State v. Avery T., Jr.
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8592 - 2017-09-19
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8592 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
State v. Craig A. Sommer
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Development
when it applied a de novo standard of review and that DWD’s decision is unreasonable, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13492 - 2017-09-21
when it applied a de novo standard of review and that DWD’s decision is unreasonable, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13492 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Discussion ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23
motion. Discussion ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment is de novo. See Secura Ins. v. Super Prods. LLC, 2019 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1100648 - 2026-04-08
of a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment is de novo. See Secura Ins. v. Super Prods. LLC, 2019 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1100648 - 2026-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶19, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334; Marberry, 262
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
reviews de novo. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶19, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334; Marberry, 262
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23