Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 29817 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute to a particular set of facts which is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32180 - 2008-03-24

COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same familiar methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2012-02-21

COURT OF APPEALS
County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Travanti Schmidt appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-17

[PDF] NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Joshua K. v. Nancy K.
parties” for whom the court should be concerned in custody determinations. Further, he argues that in de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8437 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Fond Du Lac County Department of Social Services v. Shairi K.
are a correct statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9666 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of a summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and review the grant or denial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102237 - 2013-10-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12

96 CV 1507 John Boughton v. Firstar Bank Wisconsin
. Appellants urge this court to adopt a de novo standard to review the application of a legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13188 - 2005-03-31