Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 44722 for part.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 44722 for part.
Scot Deering v. William Wangerin
in part and reversed in part. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 CANE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17878 - 2005-05-02
in part and reversed in part. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 CANE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17878 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
Otto Mogged v. Margaret A. Mogged
received notice of the hearing date, he characterizes the October 1997 proceeding as “ex parte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15107 - 2017-09-21
received notice of the hearing date, he characterizes the October 1997 proceeding as “ex parte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15107 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joel O. Peterson
as part of a plea agreement. He contends that the repeater portion of each sentence is void because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3496 - 2017-09-19
as part of a plea agreement. He contends that the repeater portion of each sentence is void because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3496 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court for Dodge County: BRIAN A. PFITZINGER, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144506 - 2017-09-21
court for Dodge County: BRIAN A. PFITZINGER, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144506 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joel O. Peterson
intentional homicide, to which he pleaded guilty as a repeater as part of a plea agreement. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3496 - 2005-03-31
intentional homicide, to which he pleaded guilty as a repeater as part of a plea agreement. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3496 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 27
of Transportation (DOT) appeals from a circuit court order that vacated part of an No. 2009AP548 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44735 - 2014-09-15
of Transportation (DOT) appeals from a circuit court order that vacated part of an No. 2009AP548 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44735 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Scot Deering v. William Wangerin
court for Brown County: MARK A. WARPINSKI, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17878 - 2017-09-21
court for Brown County: MARK A. WARPINSKI, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17878 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 receive replaced parts pursuant to § ATCP 132.03(3)(f).5 Solely for purposes of this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600688 - 2022-12-15
6 receive replaced parts pursuant to § ATCP 132.03(3)(f).5 Solely for purposes of this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600688 - 2022-12-15
WI App 122 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP488 Complete Title of...
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: william e. hanrahan, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69081 - 2013-04-23
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: william e. hanrahan, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69081 - 2013-04-23
Trista Auman v. School District of Stanley-Boyd
participation in recess activities was required as part of the school district's curriculum.[4] Therefore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16415 - 2005-03-31
participation in recess activities was required as part of the school district's curriculum.[4] Therefore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16415 - 2005-03-31