Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 46719 for show's.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 46719 for show's.
[PDF]
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. William D. Ridgely
an alternative writ of mandamus directing Ridgely to comply with the request within forty-five days, or show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14241 - 2014-09-15
an alternative writ of mandamus directing Ridgely to comply with the request within forty-five days, or show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14241 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jack L. B.
only if there was also evidence showing that the son heard or was aware of it. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31
only if there was also evidence showing that the son heard or was aware of it. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
. A defendant seeking sentence modification must show the existence of a new factor. State v. Franklin, 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
. A defendant seeking sentence modification must show the existence of a new factor. State v. Franklin, 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
. A defendant seeking sentence modification must show the existence of a new factor. State v. Franklin, 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
. A defendant seeking sentence modification must show the existence of a new factor. State v. Franklin, 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
. Burns raised three issues on direct appeal: (1) the show-up procedure employed by the Milwaukee police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
. Burns raised three issues on direct appeal: (1) the show-up procedure employed by the Milwaukee police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
State v. John S. Spicer
performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that are “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21627 - 2006-03-01
performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that are “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21627 - 2006-03-01
State v. David W. Hendricks
to an offer of proof at trial and testimony at the postconviction hearing, Hendricks wanted to show that Cindy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8189 - 2005-03-31
to an offer of proof at trial and testimony at the postconviction hearing, Hendricks wanted to show that Cindy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. A circuit court may modify a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor. See State v. Harbor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138484 - 2017-09-21
. A circuit court may modify a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor. See State v. Harbor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138484 - 2017-09-21
State v. Terrence A. Hood
of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that counsel’s errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3324 - 2005-03-31
of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that counsel’s errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3324 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to make a prima facie showing that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
failed to make a prima facie showing that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02