Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 58277 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Daniel Edward Holman
following a trial to the court for a civil forfeiture violation of § 244-18 of the MILWAUKEE CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13034 - 2017-09-21
following a trial to the court for a civil forfeiture violation of § 244-18 of the MILWAUKEE CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13034 - 2017-09-21
City of Milwaukee v. Daniel Edward Holman
. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Daniel Edward Holman appeals from a judgment of conviction entered following a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13034 - 2005-03-31
. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Daniel Edward Holman appeals from a judgment of conviction entered following a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13034 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott Heimermann
) whether he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice, pursuant to § 752.35, Stats.;[2] (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
) whether he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice, pursuant to § 752.35, Stats.;[2] (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. He argues the trial court erred by denying his requests to allow him to enter a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36453 - 2009-05-11
for postconviction relief. He argues the trial court erred by denying his requests to allow him to enter a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36453 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
State v. Juan Mata
. See §§ 940.19(1) and 947.01, STATS. Mata argues that because the trial court stated to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12854 - 2017-09-21
. See §§ 940.19(1) and 947.01, STATS. Mata argues that because the trial court stated to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12854 - 2017-09-21
State v. Juan Mata
. Mata argues that because the trial court stated to the jury that Mata was “a habitual offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12854 - 2005-03-31
. Mata argues that because the trial court stated to the jury that Mata was “a habitual offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. D. Ramee K. Fulani
verdict convicting him of battery, see WIS. STAT. § 940.19(1), and from the trial court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6803 - 2017-09-20
verdict convicting him of battery, see WIS. STAT. § 940.19(1), and from the trial court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6803 - 2017-09-20
State v. D. Ramee K. Fulani
on a jury verdict convicting him of battery, see Wis. Stat. § 940.19(1), and from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31
on a jury verdict convicting him of battery, see Wis. Stat. § 940.19(1), and from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for relief. In his postconviction motion, Flynn claimed that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36591 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for relief. In his postconviction motion, Flynn claimed that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36591 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for relief. In his postconviction motion, Flynn claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36591 - 2009-05-26
motion for relief. In his postconviction motion, Flynn claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36591 - 2009-05-26