Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2021 - 2030 of 58458 for speedy trial.

Winnebago County Health and Human Services v. Bridget D.
trial following the termination of her parental rights.[2] Bridget argues that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6309 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Winnebago County Health and Human Services v. Bridget D.
D. appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial following the termination of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6309 - 2017-09-19

City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
of the circuit court that granted Thomas L. Carter’s motion to dismiss the City’s appeal for a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6419 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
that granted Thomas L. Carter’s motion to dismiss the City’s appeal for a de novo trial filed under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6419 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Eric E. Rice v. Gerald Sielaff, M.D.
before her death due to heart failure. Prior to trial, Dr. Sielaff moved for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24661 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. He argues the trial court erred by denying his requests to allow him to enter a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36453 - 2009-05-11

[PDF] State v. Juan Mata
. See §§ 940.19(1) and 947.01, STATS. Mata argues that because the trial court stated to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12854 - 2017-09-21

State v. Juan Mata
. Mata argues that because the trial court stated to the jury that Mata was “a habitual offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12854 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott Heimermann
) whether he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice, pursuant to § 752.35, Stats.;[2] (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31

State v. D. Ramee K. Fulani
on a jury verdict convicting him of battery, see Wis. Stat. § 940.19(1), and from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31