Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20201 - 20210 of 29756 for des.
Search results 20201 - 20210 of 29756 for des.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525963 - 2022-05-25
they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525963 - 2022-05-25
[PDF]
State v. William A. Rouse
review de novo. State v. Holmgren, 229 Wis. 2d 358, 366, 599 N.W.2d 876 (Ct. App. 1999). The court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3752 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Holmgren, 229 Wis. 2d 358, 366, 599 N.W.2d 876 (Ct. App. 1999). The court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3752 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 26
and application of a statute to a set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Wood v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59093 - 2014-09-15
and application of a statute to a set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Wood v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59093 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc., 2010 WI 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694893 - 2023-08-29
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc., 2010 WI 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694893 - 2023-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Carlos D. Hope
that we review de novo. State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d 354, 360, 444 N.W.2d 432 (Ct. App. 1989). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16174 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d 354, 360, 444 N.W.2d 432 (Ct. App. 1989). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16174 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
De Ann Nichols v. Monte Nichols
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DE ANN NICHOLS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7407 - 2017-09-20
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DE ANN NICHOLS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7407 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Thomas D. Gogin
of the Strickland standard. ¶12 We review a determination of prejudice de novo because it presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2857 - 2017-09-19
of the Strickland standard. ¶12 We review a determination of prejudice de novo because it presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2857 - 2017-09-19
Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148 (1996
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17172 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148 (1996
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17172 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to de novo review. Id. ¶14 In Vogt, the court concluded that a law enforcement officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123009 - 2014-10-01
is subject to de novo review. Id. ¶14 In Vogt, the court concluded that a law enforcement officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123009 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
Jacquelyn Peronto v. Case Corporation
. § 802.08(2); Mullen v. Walczak, 2003 WI 75, ¶11, 262 Wis. 2d 708, 664 N.W.2d 76. Our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7416 - 2017-09-20
. § 802.08(2); Mullen v. Walczak, 2003 WI 75, ¶11, 262 Wis. 2d 708, 664 N.W.2d 76. Our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7416 - 2017-09-20