Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20201 - 20210 of 64013 for records/1000.
Search results 20201 - 20210 of 64013 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after several warnings, and based on the undisputed record evidence. We agree with the City. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037089 - 2025-11-18
after several warnings, and based on the undisputed record evidence. We agree with the City. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037089 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
closing argument. Our review of the record supports the trial court’s determination that Wagner’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29963 - 2007-08-13
closing argument. Our review of the record supports the trial court’s determination that Wagner’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29963 - 2007-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261854 - 2020-05-27
consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261854 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132980 - 2017-09-21
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132980 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ramon H.
the juvenile court must base its waiver decision: (a) The personality and prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2532 - 2005-03-31
the juvenile court must base its waiver decision: (a) The personality and prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742154 - 2023-12-19
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742154 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855147 - 2024-10-01
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855147 - 2024-10-01
State v. Gerold A. Haut
that has no basis in law. Based on the record, we conclude that Haut’s trial counsel did just that. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7449 - 2005-03-31
that has no basis in law. Based on the record, we conclude that Haut’s trial counsel did just that. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7449 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 971.23(1).1 Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907053 - 2025-01-30
. § 971.23(1).1 Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907053 - 2025-01-30
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
, McPhetridge has offered no proof that: (1) such records actually exist; (2) such records would have contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
, McPhetridge has offered no proof that: (1) such records actually exist; (2) such records would have contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31