Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 29751 for des.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 29751 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
). Application of a statute to the facts of record presents a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29625 - 2007-07-10
). Application of a statute to the facts of record presents a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29625 - 2007-07-10
Robin C. Acker v. Lawrence P. Sullivan, M.D.
of disputed material fact). Our review is de novo. See Wisconsin Natural Gas Co. v. Ford, Bacon & Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8465 - 2005-03-31
of disputed material fact). Our review is de novo. See Wisconsin Natural Gas Co. v. Ford, Bacon & Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8465 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard K. Melville
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20108 - 2007-06-04
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20108 - 2007-06-04
The Landings LLC v. The City of Waupaca
review de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 979, 542 N.W.2d 148 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19123 - 2005-08-30
review de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 979, 542 N.W.2d 148 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19123 - 2005-08-30
Michael W. Bruzas v. Cipriano Quezada-Garcia
to the committee’s decisions but would review them de novo.” Id. In so holding, the court rejected the employer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2114 - 2005-03-31
to the committee’s decisions but would review them de novo.” Id. In so holding, the court rejected the employer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Malachi Watkins v. Michelle Watkins
is a question of law which this court determines de novo. McCarthy v. McCarthy, 146 Wis. 2d 510, 513-14, 431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2610 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which this court determines de novo. McCarthy v. McCarthy, 146 Wis. 2d 510, 513-14, 431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2610 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of Lyndon v. Gilbert D. Jensen
of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19336 - 2017-09-21
of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152780 - 2017-09-21
¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152780 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
and constitutional muster presents a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31
and constitutional muster presents a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2013AP518 5 A. Standard of Review ¶8 Our review on summary judgment is de novo. Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111937 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP518 5 A. Standard of Review ¶8 Our review on summary judgment is de novo. Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111937 - 2017-09-21