Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
suspicion to stop or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
suspicion to stop or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2); Monicken, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
they are clearly erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2); Monicken, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
Clark Wolff v. Town of Jamestown
case is a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Armada at 470, 516 N.W.2d at 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14645 - 2005-03-31
case is a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Armada at 470, 516 N.W.2d at 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14645 - 2005-03-31
Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148 (1996
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17172 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148 (1996
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 42
, WIS. STAT. § 973.155 (2023-24),1 to undisputed facts, which is a matter of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973433 - 2025-08-21
, WIS. STAT. § 973.155 (2023-24),1 to undisputed facts, which is a matter of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973433 - 2025-08-21
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
” is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
” is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Warren
prong is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
prong is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the instructions correctly state the law is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See id. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212411 - 2019-05-31
the instructions correctly state the law is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See id. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212411 - 2019-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law for de novo review. See State v. McAttee, 2001 WI App 262, ¶8, 248 Wis. 2d 865, 637 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172918 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law for de novo review. See State v. McAttee, 2001 WI App 262, ¶8, 248 Wis. 2d 865, 637 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172918 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
remedial contempt under particular circumstances, which are questions of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121307 - 2014-09-15
remedial contempt under particular circumstances, which are questions of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121307 - 2014-09-15