Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 24568 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
and five years of extended supervision. ¶8 Smith moved for postconviction relief. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09
and five years of extended supervision. ¶8 Smith moved for postconviction relief. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09
Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. Robert B. Kliesmet
Sheriffs have a duty to provide reasonable protection to jailed persons, and that duty extends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17142 - 2005-03-31
Sheriffs have a duty to provide reasonable protection to jailed persons, and that duty extends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17142 - 2005-03-31
Sauk County v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
with respect to the contaminated property surrounding the landfill. The duty to indemnify does not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9078 - 2005-03-31
with respect to the contaminated property surrounding the landfill. The duty to indemnify does not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9078 - 2005-03-31
Rose Lannoye v. Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation
to submit a proof of claim is one-year and 120-days. The time period can be extended only in the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2517 - 2005-03-31
to submit a proof of claim is one-year and 120-days. The time period can be extended only in the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of six years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. The trial court, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149388 - 2017-09-21
of six years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. The trial court, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
(1995). Here, the Jaunichs agreed to extend the closing date, which suggests timing may not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27414 - 2014-09-15
(1995). Here, the Jaunichs agreed to extend the closing date, which suggests timing may not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rosemary K. Oliveira v. City of Milwaukee
to act within the 90-day period or the agreed extended time shall constitute denial of the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14430 - 2017-09-21
to act within the 90-day period or the agreed extended time shall constitute denial of the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14430 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the line’s burial notwithstanding.[5] We agree. A landowner’s rights extend below the surface
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93997 - 2013-03-11
, the line’s burial notwithstanding.[5] We agree. A landowner’s rights extend below the surface
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93997 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
WI APP 22
in [Orbitz’s] favor and against extending the reach of the taxing authority.” ¶8 DOR sought judicial review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21
in [Orbitz’s] favor and against extending the reach of the taxing authority.” ¶8 DOR sought judicial review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21
Karen I. Olski v. Robert J. Olski
, was on an extended leave of absence and was unlikely to return to work. Under these circumstances the court noted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16888 - 2005-03-31
, was on an extended leave of absence and was unlikely to return to work. Under these circumstances the court noted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16888 - 2005-03-31